[ad_1]
Kant and Machiavelli have contrasting views about truth-telling and commitment-keeping. Kant believes that we have very strong reason to tell the
truth and keep our promises, independent of anticipated results, while Machiavelli believes that our reasons to tell the truth and keep our promises
have to do with esteem and reputation.
Using about a page, give Kant’s argument for the claim that we are morally obliged to tell the truth and keep our promises independent of anticipated
results. Please disregard any obviously counterintuitive claims that Kant makes. This paper should not be able how Kant says that we can’t lie under
any circumstances.
Using about a page, explain Machiavelli’s argument for the claim that truth-telling and promise-keeping have reputation as their goal.
Using about a page, explain which of those views you find more plausible, and why. Your answer must include a description of some defect in the best
argument offered for the answer that you think is wrong (e.g., if you adopt Kant’s view, you have to say how Machiavelli went logically wrong, not just
that he did).
Using about a page, explain your own view of the reasons to tell the truth and keep promises. You must make it clear why your view is the right view,
or is a plausible contender for being the right view. We’ve already been through relativism — you don’t get to evade having a view by saying that it’s
up to everyone to decide for him- or herself, as you are one of those him- or herselves who has to decide. You must take a stand.
Sample Solution
The post Truth-telling and commitment-keeping appeared first on acestar tutors.
[ad_2]
Source link