[ad_1]
As we have learned the US Health Care system has had its ups and downs but oddly still has ways to go in assuring that every member of society is given the human right of adequate health care that they can afford. During Theodore Roosevelt’s presidency that health insurance was considered in terms of government need assistance to bring the matter of coverage to the forefront. Decades later President Barack Obama brought about resembles of change with the Affordable Care Act and Patient Protection addressing that once again the government can play a role in ushering affordable and adequate health care to the masses by opening the door for significant changes to the status quo – and ensured that for decades to come, President, Obama benchmark reforms would be the starting point for all future health reform and technologies. Let’s examine one of the initiatives called Healthy People initiative a series of ten year plans to outline key national health objectives (Shi & Singh, 2019) These initiatives established a benchmark for and monitoring progress towards the following goals to encourage collaborations across communities and sectors; to empower individuals to make informed health decisions, and to measure the impact of prevention activities (Shi & Singh, 2019) Mark 10:27: And Jesus looking upon them saith, With men, it is impossible, but not with God: for with God, all things are possible.
Healthy People 2010 SWOT
In January 2000 after the end of Healthy People 2000 the first decade the decision was made to hone the objective for Healthy People 2010 as 467 objectives designed to serve as a framework for improving the health of all people in the The United States during the first decade of the 21st century. Released online October 2011, Healthy People 2010 builds on similar initiatives pursued over the preceding two decades. Two overarching goals—to increase quality and years of healthy life and to eliminate health disparities—served to guide the development of objectives that would be used to measure progress. Each objective has a target to be achieved by the year 2010. These objectives are organized into 28 focus areas, each representing an important public health area. A selected set of objectives, known as the Leading Health Indicators, was created to help identify sentinel measures of public health, and to encourage wide participation in improving health in the next decade. These indicators were chosen based on their ability to motivate action, the availability of data to measure their progress and their relevance as broad public health issues. (CDC, 2015) Goal One Increase the quality and longevity of life. Goal Two eliminate health disparities among race, gender, income, geographical areas, disability, and sexual orientation.
SWOT Analysis
Strengths – According to Sondik peer-review article Progress Toward the Healthy People 2010 Goals and Objectives To date, 23 states had adapted the national Healthy People agenda to establish their own disease-prevention and health-promotion programs, and were expected that virtually all states have drawn on the framework in one form or another to develop and execute their programs. (Sondik et al., 2009) From the base year of 2000 to 2006, the most recent data year with complete mortality statistics, both longevity at birth and longevity at age65, have shown significant increases as measured by beginning and endpoints and by trends. Longevity at birth has increased 1.2%over the decade whereas longevity at age 65has increased by 5.1%. Infant mortality also shows a significant decrease, declining 4.2% between the baseline year of 1998and 2005, but only by the endpoints. The trend is not statistically significant and has been essentially flat (Sondik et al., 2009)
Weakness – For mortality rates due to coronary heart disease, the Healthy People 2010 target of 162 deaths per 100,000 were met for all groups except African Americans. Heart disease remains the number one killer in the United States; however, African Americans have higher rates of mortality from coronary heart disease than other groups. (Anderson, 2012) when rates of mammography are examined by socioeconomic status, the rates for poor and near-poor women are still far too low, especially compared with those for middle- and high-income women in terms of mammography screening. (Anderson, 2012)
Opportunity – Mammography rates by race/ethnic group represent a piece of good news. The gap between the group with the highest rate of mammography screening (whites) and the group with the lowest (as of 2010, Latinos) has narrowed over time. The assistant secretary of health Howard Koh raised the question of how changes should be made to achieve health equality as part of the Healthy People 2010 objectives. One suggestion is to focus on translating research results into effective community programs
Threats – As with any health disparities that identify with race threats exist due to language gaps or cultural and religious norms that do not allow for certain ethnic groups to utilize mammograms. Another threat is the need to issue health care to those who are unable to afford through work or can not afford to fund it themselves are limited to that physician recommendation to have themselves screened.
Conclusion
Of note government involvement should be a method in which we can increase the ability for all American to receive the care that they need without the fear that it may be subpar or limited due to financial backing. Healthy People 2010 second the goal was to make a step towards eliminating health disparity but did not meet the mark set so it was moved onto the next decades 2020.
Reference:
CDC, C. for D. C. and P. (2015, November 6). Healthy People – Healthy People 2010. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/healthy_people/hp2010.htm.
Glasgow RE, Lichtenstein E, Marcus AC. Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research into practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. American Journal of Public Health. 2003;93(8):1261–1267
Shi, L., & Singh, D. A. (2019). Essentials of the U.S. health care system. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Sondik, E. J., Huang, D. T., Klein, R. J., & Satcher, D. (2009). Progress Toward the Healthy People 2010 Goals and Objectives. Annual Review of Public Health, 31(1), 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809….
Sample Solution
The post Ups and downs of the US Health Care system appeared first on acestar tutors.
[ad_2]
Source link