| |
1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2 Less than Satisfactory 75.00% |
3 Satisfactory 83.00% |
4 Good 94.00% |
5 Excellent 100.00% |
| 80.0 %Content |
|
| 30.0 %Comprehensive Summary of Teaching Plan With Epidemiological Rationale for Topic |
Summary of community teaching plan is not identified or missing. |
Summary of community teaching plan is incomplete. |
Summary of community teaching plan is offered but some elements are vague. |
Focus of community teaching is clear with a detailed summary of each component. Rationale is not provided. |
Focus of community teaching is clear, consistent with Functional Health Patterns (FHP) assessment findings and supported by explanation of epidemiological rationale. |
|
| 50.0 %Evaluation of Teaching Experience With Discussion of Community Response to Teaching Provided. Areas of Strength and Areas of Improvement Described |
Evaluation of teaching experience is omitted or incomplete. |
Evaluation of teaching experience is unclear and/or discussion of community response to teaching is missing. |
Evaluation of teaching experience is provided with a brief discussion of community response to teaching. |
A detailed evaluation of teaching experience with discussion of community response to teaching and areas of strength/improvement is provided. |
Comprehensive evaluation of teaching experience with discussion of community response provided along with a detailed description of barriers and strategies to overcome barriers is provided. |
|
| 15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness |
|
| 5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose |
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
Thesis is insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. |
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. |
Thesis is comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
|
| 5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions |
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. |
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. |
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. |
A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. |
There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. |
|
| 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. |
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
|
| 5.0 %Format |
|
| 2.0 %Paper Format |
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
All format elements are correct. |
|
| 3.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) |
No reference page is included. No citations are used. |
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. |
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. |
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style guide is usually correct. |
In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. |
|
| 100 %Total Weightage |