[ad_1]
First, read the “Original paper” I attached here.
Second, Read the “Reviewers comments on Original paper” I also attached here.
Third, Look at the “Response to Reviewers Template” and start the work.
You will do and deliver two things, “Revised Manuscript” & “Response to Reviewers”
——————————————————————-
1- “Revised Manuscript”
Please carefully read the reviewer’s critiques. You are expected to address all the reviewers comments point-by-point and revise the manuscript accordingly.
In the revised manuscript, please highlight all the changed or newly added parts with a yellow highlighter in the manuscript (e.g., text, figure legends, reference, etc.). This helps reviewers easily find the changed part.
2- “Response to Reviewers”
I also attach an example of Response to Reviewers. Please use this as a template.
Please copy and paste reviewers comments (negative ones need to be addressed mostly) to the template and build-up your responses to the comments. Generally, authors are expected to accept the reviewers suggestions and change their manuscript following the reviewers comments. However, sometimes, you can also argue with them, if you believe their criticisms are not relevant.
There is no page limit in the Response to Reviewer but you need to address them all. Please use We/our/ours instead of I/my/mine in the communications with the reviewers.
Use single-spaced, 0.5 inch margins, 11 pt. Arial font.
*Note, you need to read the reference articles according to the reviewer comments. You will find them in the original paper.*
I really need professional quality.
[ad_2]
Source link
