Assessment Course Paper

Assessment Course Paper

PROMPT:

The institution has employed a first-year experience (FYE) pilot program for at-risk, first-year student populations. In addition to a specific introductory course sequence, students are engaged with intrusive and proactive student success resources and interventions (e.g., academic advising, tutoring, collaborative learning). Faculty and student services have reported enhanced outcomes for these students compared to students who were not part of the FYE pilot and are considering scaling the pilot to a larger population or potentially the entire student body.

Given that information, please respond to the following prompts:

  1. Which elements of your mental model resonate with the situation?
  2. For your given assessment approach, how might you mitigate bias from you or others associated with this scenario? Assessment Course Paper.

 

COMPLETION CONSIDERATIONS:

The rubric below is provided based on related elements to the prompt, as well as common clarifying questions from the instructor based on student responses.

Regardless of quality, length of past submissions varied between 100 and 400 words. Know appropriate responses tended to be in the middle or closer to the top end of the range. This is not a hard word limit, so you can go over if needed.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

Rubric

Module 5: FYE Case Study Rubric

Module 5: FYE Case Study Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Individual Application
5 pts

Shares or applies their mental model from personal identities and/or professional experiences in a way that is relevant to the assignment and easy to understand.

 3 pts

Shares or applies their mental model from personal identities and/or professional experiences, but may not be relevant to the assignment or easy to understand.

 0 pts

Does not share or apply any perspective from personal identities and/or professional experiences in relation to the assignment.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Lens
5 pts

Supported with logic or reference to course material, identifies and pushes back on at least one premise element or prompt ambiguity from a diversity, equity, or inclusion lens. Assessment Course Paper.

 3 pts

Identifies at least one premise element or prompt ambiguity that may be worth questioning worth pushback from a diversity, equity, or inclusion lens.

 0 pts

Does not mention or see any issues in premise elements or prompt ambiguity worth pushback from a diversity, equity, or inclusion lens.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Complete Response
5 pts

Completely addresses both elements of the prompt.

 3 pts

Partially addresses one or both elements of the prompt.

 0 pts

Does not address both elements of the prompt.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reference to Materials
5 pts

Response includes reference to materials or concepts from the module (or beyond) which are relevant and explained clearly.

 3 pts

Response includes a reference to materials or concepts from the module (or beyond), but the concept may not be relevant or explained clearly.

 0 pts

Response does not include any reference to materials or concepts from the module (or beyond).
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Response Structure
5 pts

Response is clear, logically organized, and easy to follow or understand.

 3 pts

Response may not be one of the following: clear, logically organized, and easy to follow or understand.

 0 pts

Response is not any of the following: clear, logically organized, and easy to follow or understand.
5 pts
Total Points: 25

 

Assessment Course Paper