HRCU 351 Week 4: Paper 1 – Staffing Strategy
Guidelines and Grading Rubric
Length: 3-4 double-spaced pages (excluding title and references pages)
Due: Week 4 by Sunday Midnight
Value: 110 Points
References: Four (4) or more scholarly sources including 3 journal articles and at least one direct
quote from our textbook.
Post: Week 4 Assignments (through Turnitin)
Prepare a 3 – 4 page (not including cover or reference pages) research-based paper on a specific organization of your choice, and analyze and evaluate their staffing strategy by 1) identifying two (2) best practices supported by research; 2) identifying two (2) effective staffing strategies that are working for this organization; 3) making specific recommendations improving the organization’s staffing strategy; and 4) identifying two (2) insights gained into staffing strategies.
To repeat, your analysis should:
● Identify two (2) best practices, supported by research
● Identify two (2) effective staffing strategies that are working well for this organization
● Make specific recommendations for improvingthe organization’s staffing strategy
● identifying two (2) insights gained into staffing strategies
Rubric: Evaluation Criteria
Criteria | Exemplary | Proficient | Developing | Emerging | No credit |
Best Practices and Two Effective Strategies of Organization – | 40- 35 Clearly and concisely describes 2 best practices supported by citations of expert theories and research. Defines all key terms and comprehensively discusses why each practice is effective. | 34 – 30 Fairly clearly describes 2 best practices mostly supported by citations of expert theories and research. Defines most key terms and discusses why each practice is effective. | 29 – 24 Somewhat clearly describes 1 – 2 best practices supported by some citations of expert theories and research. May not define key terms and/or discuss why practices are effective. | 23 Local Government – 1 Limited if any description of best practices supported by research or citations. Does not define key terms and/or discuss why practices are effective. | 0 Assignment, meeting grading criteria, was not submitted. |
Recommendations | 30 – 27 Accurately uses findings of comparing best and actual staffing practices to make specific recommendations that would strengthen staffing effectiveness. | 26 – 21 Fairly accurately uses findings of comparing best and actual staffing practices to make fairly specific recommendations that may strengthen staffing effectiveness. | 20 – 14 Somewhat uses findings of comparing best and actual staffing practices to make general recommendations; that may or may not strengthen staffing effectiveness. | 13 – 1 Recommendations if made to improve staffing practices are not based on findings of comparing best and actual staffing effectiveness. | Assignment, meeting grading criteria, was not submitted. |
Reflective Analysis | 20 – 26 Clearly and concisely discusses 2 insights gained into effectively workforce staffing. Identifies specific actions to enhance leadership effectiveness in workplace staffing.. | 25- 20 Discusses 2 insights gained into effectively workforce staffing. Identifies fairly specific actions to enhance leadership effectiveness in workforce staffing. . | 19 – 14 Discusses 1 – 2 insights gained into effectively workforce staffing. Identifies general actions to enhance leadership effectiveness in workforce staffing. | 13 – 1 Limited if any reflective analysis. May discuss 0 – 1 insights gained into effectively staffing workforces. May not identify actions to enhance workforce staffing employees | Assignment, meeting grading criteria, was not submitted. |
APA and Sources | 10-8 Uses 4 or more scholarly sources including textbook and 3 journal articles. Accurately adheres to APA standards; reference page and citations are correct. All sources listed in References are cited in paper. Includes at least one direct quote from our textbook. | 7-6 Uses 2 – 3 scholarly sources including 2 journal articles. Adheres to APA standards; reference page and citations are correct with minor (1-3) errors. . All sources listed in References are cited in paper | 5-4 Uses 1 – 2 scholarly sources including 1 journal article. APA standards are somewhat followed in the paper and Reference page; the work of others is cited but with numerous errors. Sources listed in References and citations may not match | 3 – 1 Uses 0 – 2 scholarly sources. Limited adherence to APA standards in the paper and Reference page; work of others may be cited but with multiple errors. Sources listed in References and citations do not match | Assignment, meeting grading criteria, was not submitted. |
Writing Mechanics | 10-8 Paper is logical and well-written; spelling, grammar and punctuation are accurate. Paper is the required length of 3 – 4 pages of content, and includes a correctly prepared title page. | 7-6 Paper is logical and well-written but with minor (1 – 3) errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation. The content may be 5% too long or short; includes a correctly prepared title page. | 5-4 Paper is somewhat logical and well-written but with several (4 – 10) errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation. Content may be 10% too long or short; and may not include a correctly prepared title page | 3 – 1 The paper lacks clarity and may be confusing; may contain numerous (11+) errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation. The content may be 15% too long or short, and may not include a title page | Assignment, meeting grading criteria, was not submitted. |