[ad_1]
All essays must reference at least one finding in the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC) summary for policy makers.
All essays must also discuss at least two readings from the relevant week.
Consult the Week Two and Week Five lecture recording for further details of
the assignment (word limit, bibliography, sexist language etc.).
1. Schwenkenbecher and Hiller offer different arguments for an individual
moral obligation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Which argument is
better and why?
Format: Please follow the format of my sample essay. I did not well on that one, only received a 74/100. Although I want this essay to have improvement on the grades, it is still the priority to make sure that its not suspicious of me getting this essay from somewhere. This essay requires 2000 words, not including cover page and citations. Also, please use American English.
Grader comments on my first essay: Good road-maping in the introduction paragraph!
Quite a few sentences were confusingly stated, making the paper a bit difficult to read. Logically connection between ideas was a bit hard to follow (i.e., the discussion of exercise and water boiling as it relates to climate change). The paper had a lot of summary, and the general action principle specifically needed more explanation and analysis.
Good incorporating the IPCC report.
Other requirement please read the document below.
[ad_2]
Source link
