Political Analysis Rationality Behavior Instition Exam Paper
Political Anaylisis ( Rationality behaviour instition exam) I have an exam tomorrow There will be two parts and each one has 30 min time limit. ( please check the attachment) need someone who have knowledge about political anaylisis exercises and respond me when I taking exam I attached exercises sample. Actually if you have enough knowledge about political science and analysis its not difficult task ( easier than assigment) problem is limited time
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW
It would seem obvious to most that large tobacco growing states like South Carolina would be the main voters against stricter legislation. In actuality large tobacco companies like Philip Morris are some of the largest donators to the politicians in the non tobacco states. As said in this article, “As long as Washington lawmakers are hooked on donations from Big Tobacco, the industry has enough friends to ward off strong federal oversight.” This statement is very true.Political Analysis Rationality Behavior Instition Exam Paper. For years now many bills and acts have been presented to congress such as the Healthy Kids’ Act which would allow the Food and Drug Administration to regulate tobacco, create a major anti-smoking ad campaign, provide no immunity for lawsuits against tobacco firms, and curb youth smoking. These bills typically get voted against by politicians that have taken or need the donations and support of the tobacco industry. For example, Rep. Vic Fazio, D-Calif., who received $62,500 since 1991 — the ninth highest amount in contributions from tobacco companies among House members and the highest among lawmakers from states that don’t grow tobacco voted against the Healthy Kid’s Act aswell as two tobacco bills introduced last year, one to increase Food and Drug Administration funding and another to prohibit government funds from being used to pay for tobacco crop insurance. The consumer advocacy group Public Citizen conducted a survey in 1999 that found that members who voted in favor of tobacco legislation received considerably more money than those who didn’t. Senators voting in favor of tobacco industry positions received as much as 15 times more money from tobacco company contributions in 1997 than their counterparts who didn’t. House members received nine times more money.
What politicians might be avoiding passing in Washington, local governments are passing in their small and large counties. One thousand five hundred and fifteen counties in the nation have banned smo… Political Analysis Rationality Behavior Instition Exam Paper.
