[ad_1]
After reading “Sleazy in Seattle”, please comment here to each of the following questions. These questions are taken directly from the article and your answers should refer to the article and to your text reading as appropriate.
1.How does the behavior of the attorneys at Bogle and Gates raise concerns about legal ethics in this case? Include specific examples from the discovery process.
2.What do you think of the attorney’s duty to “zealously advocate” for their clients in this case? Do you agree with the experts that the behavior of the law firm was appropriate and responsible, or do you agree with Washington State Supreme Court’s interpretation, and why?
3.Reflect on your course “Ethical Reasoning in Business,” You likely can at least appreciate these five values:
Autonomy: a person’s ability to govern herself and to order her own life (as the ethicists say, to be an ‘end in herself’) implies that she must not be used as a means to an end that she did not choose (most closely associated with deontology)
Non-pain/Pleasure: a person’s capacity to experience pain or pleasure implies that I must not cause him pain unnecessarily (most closely associated with utilitarianism)
Equality: a person must not be regarded or treated as inferior to or superior to other persons
Sample Solution
The post “Sleazy in Seattle” appeared first on acestar tutors.
[ad_2]
Source link