Reaction papers are thought papers where you critique an article. As you read the assigned articles,
point out
1)
at least one interesting fact that you learned from the introduction,
2)
study’s
strengths,
3)
the limitations of their research design (for example, the way they defined or
measured their variables, the measures’ reliability/validity, their data collection technique [e.g.,
self-report, lab visits, direct observation]),
4)
implications of their findings (so what do they
findings mean in real world!. In your implications section you must relate the study’s findings to
real life, and give it some context to make it relevant for lay people),
5)
future direction ideas (what
would you want to test next to build up on the findings of this research, and/or to address its
shortcomings).
These are some questions to have in mind as you read the article:
Did they account for confounding factors?
What other factors could explain their findings?
Were the findings substantial? Who will benefit from these?
What were some of the considerations or little things that the researchers took into
account that strengthened their design?
If you were to do subsequent investigations, what next steps would you take?
Also, if the article posed questions in your mind, mention the questions and take a
stab at giving answers too!
Show me that you’ve thought the article thorough.
I evaluate your reaction papers based on
the
depth of your thoughts and how sophisticated and well explained your arguments
comments are.
