[ad_1]
Each individual student is to create a Bioethical Paper outlining key bioethical issues by introducing variables and impact on nursing. Students should introduce the bioethical issue to include key concepts, decision making, a theoretical framework model and the significance of the decision in nursing. Discuss what concepts are highlighted and the effects on the nurse or the nursing profession. This scholarly writing should be between 3 and 4 pages long, following APA format and a minimum of three references using only nursing journals.
| Rubric for Bioethics Writing Assignment | ||||
| Essential Elements | 5- Exemplary | 4- Proficient | 3- Satisfactory | 2-Needs Improvement |
| Main Idea
-Clear -Conveys understanding of assignment -frames discussion of program outcomes and course outcomes.
|
-commendable focus
-frames discussion well -advanced demonstration of comprehension of task |
-effective focus
-effective discussion -significant demonstration of comprehension of task |
-suitable focus
-acceptable discussion -acceptable demonstration of comprehension of task |
-limited focus
-minimal discussion -negligible demonstration of comprehension of task |
| Content
-Accurate Details -Examples offered in context program outcomes. -Consistency of material -Peer reviewed material
|
-extensive presence of accurate supporting evidence.
-evidence is consistently relevant to task -accurate and logical conclusion -extraordinary synthesis of material
|
-considerable presence of accurate supporting evidence.
-detail is well suited to assignment. -evidence is relevant to the main idea -logical conclusion |
-adequate supporting information
-detail is acceptable -mostly accurate information -conclusion is present |
-minimal detail
-limited examples -material is negligible -not all resources peer reviewed.
|
| Organization
-Introduction -body -conclusion -transitions -supporting material |
-introduction present and commendable
-body is scholarly -supporting material is present and germane to assignment -transitions are smooth and enriching -reference materials are Nsg journals no later than 3 years
|
-introduction is effective
-body is supported by material -supporting material is present and enriching -transitions are smooth and effective -reference material are Nsg Journals no later than 5 years |
-introduction is acceptable
-body is acceptable but limited -supporting material limited in scope -transitions are suitable -conclusion present – reference materials are Not nursing journals but appropriate material no later than 3 years |
-introduction is present
-body of paper is present but not completely supported -conclusion is present but limited -supporting material not utilized well – reference materials are not nursing journals no later than 5 years. |
| Use of Language
-Professional Vocabulary -Varied word choice -Coherence -Reads well
|
-advanced vocabulary used appropriately
-extensive variation in sentence structure and word choice -body of work is exceptionally coherent and reads very well.
|
-ample use of professional vocabulary
-effective word choice -variation in word choice -paper is coherent and reads very well |
-acceptable use of accurate vocabulary
-word choice is satisfactory -variation in word choice is present -reads well |
-limited or incorrect vocabulary
-minimal word choice and variation -lack of coherency -does not read well |
| Mechanics
-Spelling -Grammar -syntax -APA format
|
-commendable writing technique
-control of standard writing conventions -APA format is consistently correct
|
-effective control of writing technique
-writing conventions are standard -APA format is standard with few errors |
-adequate control of standard writing techniques
-some errors in standard conventions -APA format has errors |
-limited control of standard writing techniques
-errors in conventions -APA format has significant errors. |
| Score : /25 x 4 /100 |
| Rubric for Bioethics Writing Assignment | ||||
| Essential Elements | 5- Exemplary | 4- Proficient | 3- Satisfactory | 2-Needs Improvement |
| Main Idea
-Clear -Conveys understanding of assignment -frames discussion of program outcomes and course outcomes.
|
-commendable focus
-frames discussion well -advanced demonstration of comprehension of task |
-effective focus
-effective discussion -significant demonstration of comprehension of task |
-suitable focus
-acceptable discussion -acceptable demonstration of comprehension of task |
-limited focus
-minimal discussion -negligible demonstration of comprehension of task |
| Content
-Accurate Details -Examples offered in context program outcomes. -Consistency of material -Peer reviewed material
|
-extensive presence of accurate supporting evidence.
-evidence is consistently relevant to task -accurate and logical conclusion -extraordinary synthesis of material
|
-considerable presence of accurate supporting evidence.
-detail is well suited to assignment. -evidence is relevant to the main idea -logical conclusion |
-adequate supporting information
-detail is acceptable -mostly accurate information -conclusion is present |
-minimal detail
-limited examples -material is negligible -not all resources peer reviewed.
|
| Organization
-Introduction -body -conclusion -transitions -supporting material |
-introduction present and commendable
-body is scholarly -supporting material is present and germane to assignment -transitions are smooth and enriching -reference materials are Nsg journals no later than 3 years
|
-introduction is effective
-body is supported by material -supporting material is present and enriching -transitions are smooth and effective -reference material are Nsg Journals no later than 5 years |
-introduction is acceptable
-body is acceptable but limited -supporting material limited in scope -transitions are suitable -conclusion present – reference materials are Not nursing journals but appropriate material no later than 3 years |
-introduction is present
-body of paper is present but not completely supported -conclusion is present but limited -supporting material not utilized well – reference materials are not nursing journals no later than 5 years. |
| Use of Language
-Professional Vocabulary -Varied word choice -Coherence -Reads well
|
-advanced vocabulary used appropriately
-extensive variation in sentence structure and word choice -body of work is exceptionally coherent and reads very well.
|
-ample use of professional vocabulary
-effective word choice -variation in word choice -paper is coherent and reads very well |
-acceptable use of accurate vocabulary
-word choice is satisfactory -variation in word choice is present -reads well |
-limited or incorrect vocabulary
-minimal word choice and variation -lack of coherency -does not read well |
| Mechanics
-Spelling -Grammar -syntax -APA format
|
-commendable writing technique
-control of standard writing conventions -APA format is consistently correct
|
-effective control of writing technique
-writing conventions are standard -APA format is standard with few errors |
-adequate control of standard writing techniques
-some errors in standard conventions -APA format has errors |
-limited control of standard writing techniques
-errors in conventions -APA format has significant errors. |
| Score : /25 x 4 /100 |
The post Each individual student is to create a Bioethical Paper outlining key bioethical issues by introducing variables and impact on nursing. appeared first on Infinite Essays.
[ad_2]
Source link
